Predictive scheduling laws require employers to give workers advance notice of their schedules - typically 7 to 14 days. Break that rule, and you owe the worker a "predictability pay" premium on top of their regular wages.
These laws existed in a handful of US cities before 2024. By 2026, they cover more jurisdictions and carry real financial teeth.
Where predictive scheduling laws apply in 2026
In the United States, the following jurisdictions have active predictive scheduling requirements for retail, food service, and hospitality employers above certain size thresholds:
- San Francisco, CA (Fair Work Week Ordinance)
- Seattle, WA (Secure Scheduling Ordinance)
- New York City, NY (Fair Workweek Law)
- Chicago, IL (Fair Workweek Ordinance)
- Philadelphia, PA (Fair Workweek Employment Standards)
- Oregon (statewide, Predictive Scheduling Law)
- Los Angeles, CA (retail sector, 300+ employees globally)
- Colorado (SB21-087, applies to retail and food service chains)
In the European Union, the EU Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Directive (2019/1152) requires member states to guarantee workers predictability rights. Implementation varies by country, but most EU nations now require employers to inform workers of their work schedule in advance and to compensate unpredictable schedule changes.
What the laws typically require
Requirements vary, but common elements include:
- Advance notice: Post schedules 7-14 days ahead (New York requires 14 days for fast food)
- Predictability pay: If you change a posted schedule with less than required notice, pay extra - typically 1 to 4 hours of wages per change
- Right to rest: Minimum rest between shifts (San Francisco requires 11 hours; clopenings require worker consent)
- Access to hours: Before hiring new workers, offer additional hours to existing part-timers
- Schedule records: Keep records of posted schedules, changes, and payments for 3 years
The financial exposure
In New York City, a late schedule change means you owe the worker 1 hour of predictability pay for a change made 7-13 days out, and 2 hours for a change made less than 7 days out. That's on top of their regular pay for the shift.
For a team of 30 workers with frequent last-minute changes, this adds up quickly. A restaurant that makes 15 schedule changes per week within the notice period pays roughly €5,000-8,000 in predictability premiums per year - just for poor schedule management.
What employers must track
To comply, you need records of:
- When each schedule was posted (timestamp matters)
- What the original shift was
- What changed and when you notified the worker
- Whether you paid predictability premiums for each change
- Voluntary versus employer-initiated swaps (voluntary swaps don't trigger penalties)
Paper schedules on a whiteboard cannot produce this audit trail. A spreadsheet technically can, but only if someone enters timestamps manually and consistently.
Practical compliance steps
- Publish schedules via a system that timestamps the posting
- Set an internal deadline - post by a set day and time each week
- Document every schedule change with the reason and notification time
- Train managers on which changes trigger premiums and how to calculate them
- Check whether your jurisdiction has a size threshold (many laws only apply above 250-500 global employees)
The EU picture
EU employers don't face the same per-change premium structure as US cities, but they do face requirements around written statements of working conditions and protections for workers with unpredictable hours. Workers in the EU can request more predictable arrangements after 26 weeks of employment, and employers must respond in writing within a reasonable time.
Latvia's Labour Law requires advance notice of schedule changes and sets minimum rest requirements. Workers on irregular hours must receive written contracts specifying this.
Rezano timestamps schedule posts, tracks changes, and keeps records for compliance. Try it at rezano.lv.